September, 2019 Issue

Policy & Medicine Compliance Update

Login Here

Don’t have a subscription yet? Subscribe Here ?rid=m4O2wt.

SEPTEMBER 2019 Issue

Issue Summary:

Our focus for September is on Enforcement.   To start things off we feature an in-depth review of the Oklahoma public nuisance opioid case against Johnson and Johnson.  In October we will follow-up with a review of the recent verdict.

Next we review the latest developments in the New England Compounding Center saga in which the convictions of two former executives were overturned.  We then shift to medical devices and start out with an in-depth look at the recent medical device FCA case involving Life Spine, Inc. and its involvement with healthcare professionals.  This is followed by a look at the recent ResMed case involving DME device distribution and support services.  We also continue our coverage of medical cannabis in the context of the recent FDA Warning Letters.

Rounding out the issue are articles on the impact of the Granston memorandum on qui tam litigation, and updates on the Insys opioid and CareFusion medical device cases.

FEATURE

Opioid Case Tests the Boundaries of Liability – Oklahoma, J&J and the “Mutant Poppy Strain”

By Robert N. Wilkey, Esq.

Summary:  The first opioid case to go trial has just concluded in Oklahoma with J&J as the sole defendant.  This case is important for all life science companies because of its approach to the concept of public nuisance and the fact that liability may now extend past the final manufacturer to other companies in the product supply chain (e.g., active pharmaceutical ingredient manufacturers).  This article provides a detailed review of the case.

TAGS:  Opioids, Public Nuisance, Oklahoma, J&J, API

ENFORCEMENT

The Chaos Over Drug Compounding Continues As Judge Throws Out Convictions of NECC Executives

By Carolyn Greene, Staff Writer, Policy & Medicine Compliance Update

Summary: A federal judge in Boston recently overturned the convictions of two former NECC executives who had been convicted of defrauding the FDA. In some respects, this case represents a historical anomaly.  Thus, while the NECC defendants won on their legal impossibility argument in this instance, going forward, there will be no confusion as to FDA’s authority to regulate such facilities.

TAGS:  Compounding, Executives, FDA, NECC, Convictions

Small Companies Are Not Immune from Prosecution – The Case of Life Spine, Inc.

By Kaitlin Fallon Wildoner, Esq., Senior Staff Writer

Summary: In July 2019, the Department of Justice announced a False Claims Act suit filed against Life Spine, Inc., for violations of the Act, alleging the company and two of its executives caused hospitals and surgeons to submit false claims to Medicare and Medicaid.    

TAGS:  Medical Device, FCA, Executives, Speakers’ Programs, Life Spine

DME Suppliers Remain in the Spotlight – ResMed Announces Tentative Settlement Agreement with the Justice Department

By Carolyn Greene, Staff Writer, Policy & Medicine Compliance Update

Summary: ResMed recently announced that it reached a tentative settlement agreement with the DOJ in conjunction with an investigation pertaining to ResMed’s business practices involving  DME product support services. This case highlights the ongoing enforcement spotlight on DME suppliers, and the challenges of providing product support services in conjunction with DME products.

TAGS:  Medical Device, DME, ResMed, Support Services

Cannabis

Cannabidiol Confusion Cannabidiol Confusion Continues as the FDA Weighs In

by Darshan Kulkarni, Pharm.D, MS, Esq.

Summary: The FDA’s regulation of medicinal cannabidiol containing products is an ongoing work in progress.  However, the FDA’s recent spate of Warning Letters demonstrates that companies selling CBD products need to exercise caution when making promotional claims.

TAGS:  Cannabis, FDA, Warning Letters, Promotion

Qui Tam Litigation

The Granston Memo Applied – Questions Remain

By Gwendolyn Ball, Staff Writer for Policy & Medicine Compliance Update

Summary: First announced in November 2017, the Granston Memorandum appeared to signal a change in the Justice Department’s attitude and policy  towards False Claims Act qui tam cases.  Now almost two years later,  questions remain, and it will likely require the U.S. Supreme Court to resolve them.

TAGS:  Qui Tam, Granston, DOU

 
UPDATES

An Insys Update – Settlement of Civil and Criminal Allegations

by Kaitlin Fallon Wildoner, Senior Staff Writer

Summary:  The Insys case is continuing, but in June, the company entered into a global settlement with the Justice Department.

TAGS:  Opioids, Settlement, Insys

Medical Device Update – Alleged FDA Violations Lead to a $3.3 Million Settlement for CareFusion

by Kaitlin Fallon Wildoner, Senior Staff Writer

Summary: Recently, CareFusion agreed to settle an FCA case with the Justice Department for $3.3 million while admitting to selling devices not approved or cleared by the FDA.  While the full set of facts remains under seal, it appears that CareFusion’s liability stems from faulty representations provided to the company by the original device manufacturer.

TAGS:  FCA, Medical Device, Distributor, Third Party



Employee account created by MemberMouse